Emotional Insourcing

    Wow Before How: How Teams Kill Their Best Ideas

    Marco Pasinivon Marco PasiniAugust 12, 20263 min read
    Wow Before How: How Teams Kill Their Best Ideas

    You know the scene. A meeting. Someone tosses an idea into the room. Not even a brilliant one — an average one, with potential, one that could become something.

    And then it starts. Almost instantly.

    “How is that supposed to work?” — “We don’t have time for that.” — “That won’t fly, because…”

    How, how, how. Before the idea has taken its first breath, it’s already buried under a pile of perfectly reasonable objections.

    Idea“How is that supposed to work?” firstdies“What if?” firstgrowsthe first10 seconds
    Same idea, two paths: start with the “how” and the idea falls and dies. Give wonder the first moment and it can grow. It’s decided in the first seconds.

    Wonder feels uncomfortable

    There’s a reason we jump to the “how” so fast. Wonder is uncomfortable. It leaves a question open, and open questions create uncertainty. The “how,” on the other hand, is the language of certainty — and certainty feels safe.

    But certainty shuts down the exact moment in which something genuinely new could emerge. Crush wonder with feasibility right away, and you never get to see what the idea might have become.

    There’s a difference between childish and childlike. Childish is naive. Childlike is the ability to hold a possibility open before judging it. And wisdom, as Socrates said, begins in wonder.

    The org chart of idea killers

    Picture an org chart. At the top, a “VP of No.” Next to them, a “VP of Status Quo.” And the position for new growth ideas? Vacant. Nobody’s ever filled it.

    Plenty of teams run exactly like that. Not out of bad faith — but because the reflexive “how” comes disguised as reason. It sounds responsible, smart, grown-up. And it still kills more possibilities than any competitor ever could.

    So the honest question isn’t: who on my team is blocking the good ideas? It’s: is it me?

    Wow and how are two phases, not one

    The fix is not to abolish the “how.” Without a plan, without strategy, no idea becomes anything — hope is not a strategy.

    The fix is to separate the two phases.

    First, the wonder: What if? A short, protected window in which ideas aren’t judged, only opened. Then — and only then — the “how”: the sober questions of execution, resources, risk.

    Never both at once. Because run simultaneously, the “how” always wins — it’s louder, faster, seemingly more sensible. And that’s precisely where most teams lose their future.

    How much magic are you losing because you talk the wonder to death before it can work?

    Frequently asked questions

    No. Objections matter — just not in the same breath as the idea. Give the idea a protected moment to open first. The critical check comes right after, deliberately separated.

    Give new ideas a short window without judgment. Collect and build first, evaluate second. Often it’s enough to name the two phases out loud so the team doesn’t blur them.

    The opposite. If you want results, you can’t afford to smother good ideas at birth. “Wow before how” costs a few minutes — and decides whether anything new is created at all that can deliver results later.

    Emotional Insourcing works on how people and teams respond under pressure — instead of merely functioning. If you want to explore this for your team, the [free workshop](/en/workshop) is a place to start.

    Emotional Insourcing is the decision to build emotional regulation as your own core competence.

    More about the movement →

    The Weekly Impulse.

    Every Thursday: one thought on emotional resilience, leadership, and the courage to look inward. Short. Personal. No spam. Unsubscribe with one click.

    No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Nur technisch notwendige Cookies. Kein Tracking.